[Gretl-devel] Regarding long variable names

Allin Cottrell cottrell at wfu.edu
Mon Oct 29 10:22:16 EDT 2007

On Mon, 29 Oct 2007, Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti wrote:

> On Mon, 29 Oct 2007, Allin Cottrell wrote:
> > On Mon, 29 Oct 2007, andreas.rosenblad at ltv.se wrote:
> > 
> > > Would it be terribly difficult to let gretl allow longer
> > > variable lengths?
> > 
> > Yes.  Basically, it would require that all output-formatting
> > routines be re-written from scratch.  With 15-character variable
> > names we're at the limit of what we can support using the current
> > formats, and given a sensible maximum line length of around 80
> > characters.
> ...which begs the question: is the 80-column limit 
> anachronistic? Please note that mine isn't a rhetorical 
> question.

Fair question.

> I do agree on the fact that very wide output is unreadable 
> anyway, but the 80-character limit is in itself a legacy of the 
> punched card era.

As I see it, it's mostly a readability issue; and there's also the 
matter of printability: even today, paper is of a finite width!

However, to address Andreas's subsequent question: yes, it would 
be possible to allow longer names for scalars and matrices without 
having to redo all the printing functions.  It would be tricky 
though.  Perhaps after 1.6.6.


More information about the Gretl-devel mailing list