[Gretl-devel] fdjac doc typo?
Sven Schreiber
svetosch at gmx.net
Thu Jan 17 14:48:47 EST 2008
Is it because I am too tired already, or should p.37 of the user guide
say "n>=m" instead of "n<=m" in the context of explaining the fdjac
function? (With respect to the delta method, meaning that you cannot get
out a covariance matrix which is higher-dimensional than the one you
put in.)
On the same page, n is also used as the sample size, but I'm not sure if
that really causes confusion for anybody.
thanks,
sven
More information about the Gretl-devel
mailing list