[Gretl-devel] fdjac doc typo?

Sven Schreiber svetosch at gmx.net
Thu Jan 17 14:48:47 EST 2008


Is it because I am too tired already, or should p.37 of the user guide 
say "n>=m" instead of "n<=m" in the context of explaining the fdjac 
function? (With respect to the delta method, meaning that you cannot get 
  out a covariance matrix which is higher-dimensional than the one you 
put in.)

On the same page, n is also used as the sample size, but I'm not sure if 
that really causes confusion for anybody.

thanks,
sven


More information about the Gretl-devel mailing list