ogaca42 at gmail.com
Thu May 5 14:43:02 EDT 2011
Thank everyone for your answer. Your solution is under test.
I will give you a feedback as soon as possible.
2011/5/5 Allin Cottrell <cottrell at wfu.edu>
> On Thu, 5 May 2011, Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti wrote:
> > On Wed, 4 May 2011, Allin Cottrell wrote:
> > > This is a cautionary tale: it can be more difficult that you'd
> > > think, converting code from 1-based indexing to 0-based, when you
> > > have nested loops to handle!
> > As I said in my previous message, I find it quite odd that the problem
> > hasn't surfaced in such a long time. Also mysterious is the failure by
> > valgrind to detect it. Oh well.
> It's odd, yes, but it's not something that valgrind is good at
> catching: valgrind does a great job with memory allocated on the
> "heap" (malloc) but doesn't help much with stack corruption.
> Gretl-devel mailing list
> Gretl-devel at lists.wfu.edu
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Gretl-devel