[Gretl-users] Testing the current CVS version

[Cristian Rigamonti]

On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 09:54:18PM -0400, Allin Cottrell wrote:
> 
> Any other opinions on this?  I tend to agree there are now too 
> many menu branches, but I'm not sure of the optimal way of 
> reducing them.

Me too, I was wondering about a possible re-organisation of the menu, but I
thought it was not timely to suggest it for 1.6.0; anyway, if we agree it's
time, I could think about it more seriously and come up with detailed
suggestions...

> The File menu is already rather full, and I
> suspect that putting the Session stuff under Utilities will
> make it less likely to be seen and used.

I agree...

> >I agree on both things. For the graph, it's not easy to 
> >produce horizontal bars with gnuplot. However, have a look at 
> >the attached screenshot...

Speaking about graphs, would it be difficult to have "solid" bars instead of
thin red lines in correlograms? I think the current appearance of correlogram
graphs is not optimal, especially if one is using a projector.

Cri

-- 
GPG/PGP Key-Id 0x943A5F0E      -    http://www.linux.it/~cri/cri.asc
Free software, free society    -    http://www.fsfeurope.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.wfu.edu/pipermail/gretl-users/attachments/20060712/b3336b9f/attachment.bin